Solo AI Room

Design Review Room

Practice presenting and defending a design/RFC against tough questions.

Preview of your STT entitlement

Grounded in Repo Mastery

repo_platform_core
Defend:
  • Job scheduler
Expect to be pressed on:
  • Stale mastery: Config propagation (re-certify)
  • Weak area: Cache invalidation
  • Knowledge gap: Thundering-herd on cold cache

Grounded in a Repo Mastery evidence bundle (per-dimension mastery + gaps), as of 2026-07-05T22:00:00Z. Mastery is demonstrated to RM; the room does not re-verify it.

Your scenario

You are presenting an RFC for a new service to a design review panel. One tradeoff in the design is contentious.

Audience: A design review panel of senior engineersskeptical and systems-minded

Cares about: scalability, operational cost, simplicity, failure modes

Priya, Staff Engineer

Design review panelist · Stage 1 of 3 · scripted (mock), not a real model

Solo AI

What are we solving, and what are the constraints and non-goals?

Follow-ups are AI-generated and react to your notes.

Capture as you go

Decisions, risks, questions, and actions become your shared summary

Stages

0/3 done · 33 min

Self-check

How clear were you? (private)